We remain committed to ensuring the App Store is a safe and trusted marketplace that supports a thriving developer community and more than 2.1 million US jobs, and where the rules apply equally to everyone.'Įpic Games did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney took to Twitter to respond. 'As the Court recognized 'success is not illegal.' Apple faces rigorous competition in every segment in which we do business, and we believe customers and developers choose us because our products and services are the best in the world. 'Today the Court has affirmed what we've known all along: the App Store is not in violation of antitrust law,' Apple said in a statement sent to Insider. Beats Powerbeats Pro vs Beats Fit Pro: Which workout earbuds are best. Without Apple vetting each app before publishing, 'the health of Apple's ecosystem' is at risk, Apple Chief Legal Counsel Douglas Vetter argued. Moreover, Apple said that Epic knowingly, intentionally violated developer agreements it signed.

In defense, Apple argued that Epic's foundational assertion is incorrect: The App Store is intentionally operated as a 'walled garden,' the company says, because it protects users from harm. brings this action against defendant Apple Inc., alleging violations of antitrust laws through its Apple App Store policies on iOS. A lawsuit that began in 2020, rooted in Epic Games challenge. In a better world, Sweeney argued, iPhone users could choose from a variety of App Stores with competing libraries of content and sales - a world where games like 'Fortnite' could offer players the ability to pay less by purchasing stuff directly from Epic, or to download another store entirely (like, say, Epic's own digital storefront, the Epic Games Store). The legal tussle between Apple and Epic Games, particularly concerning the popular game Fortnite, reached a pivotal moment in 2024. This left the lower courts decisions mostly intact, favoring Apple. The smartphone is an 'essential computing device,' Epic CEO Tim Sweeney argued in a letter to Apple leadership, and opening up the platform would give iPhone users, 'the rights and freedoms enjoyed on the world's leading open computing platforms including Windows and macOS.' Supreme Court declined to hear appeals from both Apple and Epic Games. In the suit, Epic Games accused Apple of operating a monopoly with its iOS App Store - a charge the judge on Friday disagreed with, ruling that Apple's practices were not monopolistic. It was this move that caused 'Fortnite' to be kicked off the App Store last year, and subsequently sparked a lawsuit between Epic and Apple. By doing this, Epic intentionally circumvented paying Apple the cut it takes from app makers for selling through its digital storefronts. Apple and Epic Games are heading back to court next month after the Fortnite maker accused the tech giant of a bad-faith attempt to open up App Store payments, according to a court order. Apple and Epic Trial Opens With a Tour of the Fortnite ‘Metaverse’.

Apple vs epic verdict